Federal Employment Law Articles

Labor Law - General

Articles Discussing General Labor Law Topics And The NLRA.

For Law Firms

Get your firm featured on ELINFONET

We feature your alerts & events and send the clicks straight to your site.

Become an affiliate

Texas Federal Judge Strikes Down NRLB’s New Joint-Employer Rule

Ogletree Deakins·

On March 8, 2024, a judge from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas blocked the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) expanded joint-employer rule that would have made it more likely for employers to be deemed joint employers.

Texas Federal Judge Struck Down Labor Board’s New Joint-Employer Rule

Jackson Lewis P.C.·

A federal judge for the U.S. Eastern District of Texas vacated the National Labor Relations Board’s new joint-employer rule, finding the rule too expansive. U.S. Chamber of Commerce et al. v. NLRB et al., No. 6:23-cv-00553 (Mar. 8, 2024). The rule, which was set to take effect March 11, 2024,

NLRB’s New Joint Employment Rules Struck Down By Federal District Court

CDF Labor Law LLP·

By: NLRB’s New Joint Employment Rules Struck Down By Federal District Court In October 2023, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its new Final Rule addressing and expanding the proper standard for determining joint employment status under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). This wa

Federal Court Vacates NLRB Joint Employer Rule, Restores 2020 “Substantial Direct and Immediate Control” Standard

Littler·

A U.S. district court ruled that the NLRB’s 2023 joint employment regulations—which provided that indirect or reserved control, even if never exercised, could be sufficient to establish joint employment—was defined overbroadly. The court restored prior regulations requiring “substantial direct and i

Top Five Labor Law Developments for February 2024

Jackson Lewis P.C.·

A Texas federal judge delayed the effective date of the National Labor Relations Board’s new joint-employer rule from February 26 to March 11, 2024. U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. NLRB , No. 6:23-cv-00553 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2024).

Recent NLRB Activity is a Mixed Bag for Employers’ Use of Restrictive Covenants

Littler·

Two recent developments involving the National Labor Relations Board’s scrutiny of restrictive covenant agreements, per its general counsel’s Memorandum 23-08, have provided a mix of good and bad news for employers.

The Fight Continues for Employee Status – Dartmouth Men's Basketball Players Are Employees Under the NLRA

FordHarrison·

Summary: On February 5, 2024, the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB or Board) Regional Director for Region 1 (Boston) announced that Dartmouth College men’s basketball players are employees under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and may vote to unionize. The Regional Director premised he

NLRB Regional Director Says Dartmouth Men’s Basketball Players Are Employees, Can Vote in Union Election

Littler·

On February 5, 2024, the NLRB’s Regional Director for Region 1, Laura Sacks, issued a written decision finding that Dartmouth’s men’s basketball players are employees under the National Labor Relations Act. Based on their status as employees, Regional Director Sacks found, Dartmouth’s men’s basketba

Top Five Labor Law Developments for January 2024

Jackson Lewis P.C.·

U nion membership continued its overall decline, according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics report.

Private Sector Union Membership Rate Held Steady in 2023

Jackson Lewis P.C.·

The union membership rate among private sector workers remained steady at 6% in 2023, according to a U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) news release . As the 2022 rate indicated, private sector union membership continues to decline since the peak in the 1950s. Organizing activity continued to inc

The Year Ahead 2024:Labor

Jackson Lewis P.C.·

Welcome to We get work™ and The Year Ahead 2024 podcast series.

Top Five Labor Law Developments for December 2023

Jackson Lewis P.C.·

The National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel provided guidance on the “reinstated” expedited election rules governing union representation procedures. Memorandum GC 24-02 .

What Would Overruling Chevron Mean for Labor and Employment Law?

Littler·

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on two cases challenging the deference given to federal agencies’ interpretations of statutes they are charged with enforcing. If Chevron is overruled or pared back, federal agencies enforcing labor and employment laws will likely face more challenges

Impact of Labor Board’s New Joint-Employer Rule on Construction Industry

Jackson Lewis P.C.·

The National Labor Relations Board’s new final rule for determining joint-employer status under the National Labor Relations Act would find joint-employer status if one employer possesses the authority to control at least one of the seven enumerated essential terms and conditions of employment, rega

Citing Legal Challenges, Labor Board Extends Effective Date of Joint-Employer Rule

Jackson Lewis P.C.·

The National Labor Relations Board has announced that the effective date of its new “joint employer” final rule is postponed by two months. The announcement coincides with several legal challenges to the rule, previously scheduled to become effective on Dec. 26, 2023. The extended effective date is

(Not So) Frozen in Time—Colorado District Court Enters Section 10(j) Order Preventing Hospital from Withholding Across-the-Board Wage Increases to Union Members Following Election

Littler·

On November 16, 2023, a federal court in Colorado issued a lengthy opinion granting in part a petition for a temporary injunction pursuant to Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”). Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital , No. 23-cv-02297, ECF No. 40 (D. Colo. Nov. 16, 2023).

Top Five Labor Law Developments for November 2023

Jackson Lewis P.C.·

The National Labor Relations Board delayed the effective date for its new joint-employer rule from Dec. 26, 2023, to Feb. 26, 2024.